WRDC

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by leythtyke, Mar 17, 2022.

  1. Stephen Dawson

    Stephen Dawson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2018
    Messages:
    36,817
    Likes Received:
    31,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
     
    Redhelen likes this.
  2. Dan

    DannyWilsonLovechild Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    15,742
    Likes Received:
    19,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Something does need to change but I think the EFL are probably as far as they can go on this. Would the government legislate? Doubtful, given the amounts of organisations that leverage debt and generate profit from doing so. Likely many of their donors and backers.

    The clubs aren't going to push the change given the owners are already in. The TV companies aren't going to suddenly pull the plug on higher funding given the increased competition and some huge entrants like Amazon.

    Could the Russian invasion and subsequent sanctions have a knock on? Maybe in that it may reduce Russian and chinese interest. But there are still plenty of US, far east and middle eastern entities willing to throw money at this sport still, staggering given history.

    I suspect we've a long time left of this.
     
    Kettlewell and Stephen Dawson like this.
  3. Stephen Dawson

    Stephen Dawson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2018
    Messages:
    36,817
    Likes Received:
    31,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    What's wrong with football? If I wanted a conservatory building on my house I'd have to have the cost of materials and Labour. In football you can sign 22 players on 3 year deals and not have 3 years worth of salaries in the account to pay them. It's dependant on outside variables. I'd like to see what the football pyramid would look like on sound financial footing. It would look drastically different.
     
  4. Archey

    Archey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    26,271
    Likes Received:
    22,054
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Parts unknown
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Absolutely! FFP and the 'fit & proper test' are not fit for purpose, and of course parachute payments take some of the jeopardy out of relegation. Part of the issue for me as well is that there's different rules around finances for the Premier League, Championship and then leagues 1 & 2. If anything, that disparity only further promotes club owners to be Liberal with the rules. The whole system needs a reform.
     
    leythtyke and Kettlewell like this.
  5. Don

    Donny-Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2018
    Messages:
    5,766
    Likes Received:
    7,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Football is a business though
    There’s thousands of companies that don’t have the cash reserves to cover the next 3 years debt.

    However, they all ought to have a solid business plan to cover their liabilities that’s been approved by interested parties. The difference in football is that the business plan often relies on a generous benefactor for income.

    unfortunately that’s not just true of Derby, it’s everyone from Man City to Scunthorpe, with very few exceptions.
     
  6. ley

    leythtyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2019
    Messages:
    8,194
    Likes Received:
    12,127
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The parachute payments after dropping from the Premier League have become a joke, since it was increased to 4 years. A 2 year parachute payment on top of an increased share of money for the rest of the league would be plenty to avoid clubs folding after relegation.
     
    Donny-Red and Stephen Dawson like this.

Share This Page