That’s my view as well. But whoever agreed to a contract that said they both had to play could well be responsible for us going down. Have we won a game with them both starting? It has to be one or the other.
I would like to see our record with them both starting in the style of a league table, as it won't look good.
Disagree. The latter two got some decent crosses in to good areas that no one attacked. Thiam's were aimless and Isgrove and Hammill weren't on the pitch when Burton were letting us come at them.
I don't like the Gardner/Williams pairing either, but we're starting the game with three forwards, so let's not chuck the towel in before a ball's been kicked.
Dani must be injured but I think cavare would have been the better replacement. No hammill or mills in the squad. Brave line up.
We beat the woeful Sunderland 1 0 Results they've both played (including one with a 45 minute sub appearance by Gardner) Played 13 Won 1 (8%) Drew 5 (38%) Lost 7 (54%) Scored 7 (1 every 1.86 games) Conceded 20 (1 every 0.65 games)
Not sure if Cavare can play left though. Or you would have to sacrifice Yids' ability to go forward by switching him over to the left.
http://www.skysports.com/football/Barnsley-vs-Burton-Alb/375004 1.25mins best corner of the game, 1.37mins inside pass which lead to goal, yeah Isgrove did loads more .......
Full backs lumping diagonal balls up to Moore like the other night. Lets hope we play every ******* thing up to his head and its the ugliest game we've ever seen, but we come away with a win. Time to stop with the tip tappy ***** across the back 4 and fight for every point.
If Mahoney on the bench is a better option than Hammill or Izzy god help us - at least they look like they care.
total p w d l f a gd pts with 12 1 5 6 7 18 11 8 without 24 7 5 12 33 39 -6 26 Sorry for lack of formatting
