I expect Boris to resign Soon

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...is-johnson-column-favoured-uk-remaining-in-eu

No words necessary really.

 

hmm,the guardian agreeing with the torygraph,when it suits ...claims and revelations,you cant beat 'em lol..

 

Don't think there's any claims or points of disagreement. Boris wrote 2 columns and then decided to go a certain way to further his career.

 

Whilst banking on Vote Leave losing

 

You've done it again .
As soon as I confront your opinion you make out I'm not letting you have yours .
Is it a thing you've got that you can post an opinion and anyone challenges it their stopping yours?
You have your opinion I have mine but either way your post was political whether you like it or not .
As for a financial penalty for these dickheads causing trouble in A&E a criminal record along with a fine is already in place . The fact its not robustly implemented especially by govt directive is IMO because it suits the argument that you put across,
Which once in place opens Pandora's box and end the NHS.

 

I'm not saying that at all, I was just pointing out that nearly every post that's non football if its something that you don't agree with you start with the Tory thing.
I totally recognise that my opinion is just that, and not everybody will agree with it, equally I am happy to debate on stuff.
It just annoys me when the 'typical Tory' stuff kicks in, I have agreed and disagreed with all the main parties in my lifetime ( OK not very much with Labour since Corbyn got in) but I have said many times how I wish John Smith hadn't suffered such a tragic early death because I think he would have been one of our greatest prime ministers ever.

 

It was actually the idea of a Labour MP, a brexiteer called Giselle Stewart.

She should be deselected and made to publicly apologise.

 

Ark....no need to apologise for that mate....it didn't read as offensive and wasn't taken that way ...nowt wrong with calling a spade etc etc .

 

Tbf I didn't say you were a typical Tory I said the argument you used for Drunks etc to pay for their treatment is typically a Tory argument.
As I said before the penalty both financially and criminally are already in place so the whole argument of them paying will stop it is not their imo it's the lack of willingness to enforce it that I believe is tactical.

 

OK that's fair enough, my argument about charging drunks etc is that there should be a charge because it could then channel straight back into NHS that's all

 

Even if that were passed it wouldn't help the NHS financially
The whole cost and administration would far out way the cost of treatment for a few drunks , that would then make way to charge obese people, sporting accidents, charge work places which in turn some would turn it back on its workers etc etc therefore implementing an American style health care !!!!!!! System.
It wouldn't be over night admitted but eventually that's what we would be passing on to our future families

 

Cheers mate, I'd just read it back this morning and it seemed to have an edge that wasn't intended, and your posts are always respectful and friendly even when we disagree

 

i think something like your examples are already in place, as far as i know the nhs bills insurance companies for treatment served after road traffic accidents.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case tbh dek.
The whole thing around the way the NHS is run is probably a national scandal if they printed the truth as to what's happening.
The labour MPs think that making a few speeches in the house and a few sentences on television is enough these days to count as protest .
Tory Blair knew what he was doing when he introduced private companies into the health service choose how he tries to justify it, it's been reported that's why he gets all these lucrative speech deals etc among other decisions he's made in office.
The labour MPs should hang their heads in shame every time a child is in the news requiring funds from charities for curable illnesses imo.