Think its the recruitment team that need selling off. Herbie Kane Patrick Schmidt Luke Thomas George Miller Combined cost in excess of £3million All are on loan at lower league clubs as they are deemed surplus to requirements at present.
Thats been generous. Isnt playing in a league of similar level at the minute and hardly done anything... wouldnt get in my local pub team.
The owners will be hoping either pinnock or hilgate get sold next season for some sell ons. I thibk conors contract is up at villa so thats gone.
Not at all. I'm saying I don't think Oxford will double their record transfer fee (which I believe is what it will take) to sign Kane, after a season in which his performances have been commended but in which they haven't finished as highly as the previous two seasons. He's reportedly done well there, but their supporters are no doubt disappointed that they have failed to reach the play offs, despite how well Kane has played.
Surely we wouldn't extend the loan to a potential play-off/promotion/top half (who knows how next season will go!) rival, and strengthen them and weaken ourselves? Particularly as we will likely be without Styles next season, besides Bassi, Gomes etc.
Time will tell. I just don't think we will accept less than a million for him, and I don't think Oxford will be prepared to pay that. In terms of him not wanting to come back, I take your point. But he's under contract and surely guaranteed to be a regular mainstay in our midfield next season, should be welcomed back with open arms. I don't think Kane was mistreated by us by the way. Every time he made a cameo under Val he fell short for me, he looked unconvincing and frankly a waste of money. Now he has apparently proven himself in League 1 and that's now our level, so.. welcome back to Grove Street Herbie, show us what you're made of. Don't forget these players earn a lot of money, we shouldn't pity the poor bairns too much. They are, after all, professionals. And privileged ones at that.
Of course we will accept less than a million or him. We are looking at a £10 million hole in the accounts. We will accept 300k in installments and a sell on fee just to get him off the books
It's difficult to judge players in what is not just a failing team, but a failing club. Given some stability and a half decent coach I think we might be surprised what some of the players now being written off can actually do. It wasn't just Alex M who was written off early by fans in the past, but also Neil Redfern when he first arrived on a permanent deal.
It's really not difficult to judge though is it? Can you really think that players on 6/7/8 grand a week like Leya Iseka, Cole, Obbi, Benson, Schmidt are going to suddenly come good playing Wednesday instead of Reading? Or that the stability you mention will actually be provided by the arsewipe ownership?
Redfearn was, and remains, total Rubbish. Never performed to any great heights. I knew as soon as Forsyth got his fangs in that was the end of her career. 'Give us a twirl'? I'd rather have a Yorkie.
Its not just the up front cost. A large chunk of our salary budget is being taken up by players on loan.
Without wanting to sound like a dick, I think you're being a bit naive, we'll accept less than a million for Kane and we'll accept it without a second thought. And quite rightly, we need the money. As you said, he never pulled up any trees for us so he's definitely not a million pound player.
Funniest thing about this post is it was the coaching team at the time who turned down signing Ivan Toney. Deemed ‘over rated’ despite the
Let us assume that the owners want Barnsley to break even next season because all the reserves of cash are gone. You are the CEO who is charged with achieving this. We do not have the accounts for this season, so I have included summarised figures for the 2020/21 season. In brackets after the Barnsley figures, are the figures for Peterborough United, who in the 2020/21 season, were in League 1, and therefore are a good comparison for what we can expect next season. Total Turnover £15.3m (£7.4m) Profit - sale of players £3.4m (£4.8m) Total Income £18.7m (£12.2m) Total Pay (inc NI & Pens) £14.4m (£7.0m) Net £4.3m (£5.2m) Overheads £8.6m (£6.2m) Net Profit -£4.3m (-£1.0m) Overhead costs include Amortisation of player transfer fees. Our pay cost for 2020/21 season are £7.4m more than those of Peterborough. Indeed, they are more than double. Peterborough player sales were higher than those of Barnsley. We know that there is no alternative to selling players, so let us assume we make £4.8m from that exercise (profit on players sales is the transfer fee received, less any remaining balance of the fee that we paid). Let us further assume that the difference in overheads is represented by the difference in player transfer fee amortisation, and that our overheads naturally fall to £6.2m following the sale of players. However Peterborough lost £1m in the year, and we must therefore add that to the £7.4m we need to save in wage costs if we are to break even. Therefore, the club has to cut its pay budget/overheads by £8.4m in order to break even. So what happens if it has no cash, the owners do not increase their funding, and it does not break even. Well, these figures are no predictor of cash flow, but transfer fees do not usually arrive in a single installment. The club must repay the second 50% of the EFL loan, and it is therefore a logical assumption that it will run out of cash. I believe the opening poster is correct. We are in a mess
Couple of suggestions in this thread about our loan players. That Kane and Aitchinson wouldn’t want to come back, or that we’ve somehow treated Kane badly. There’s other ways to look at this. We gave Aitchinson a three year contract and he was super excited about signing for us. It appears the plan for his development was always to go out on loan and I’m sure he’s a better player for it. Why wouldn’t he be excited about coming back and pushing for a first team place and a new contract? We’re not this awful club or place to be that some folk suggest. With Kane, fitness was obviously an issue heading in to last season. Why is it that it’s us palming him off to Oxford rather than us doing what was best for him personally? Maybe he appreciates us more for letting him play out the season with Oxford instead of dragging him back for a miserable relegation fight? Just like Mowatt he could come back refreshed physically and mentally. I think they’ll both be important players for us next season and for me that’s an exciting prospect amongst a backdrop of a gloomy outlook.
You don't sound like a dick mate, it's all about opinions. I think Conman will want to recoup as much as he can (I think we paid around a million?), and I don't think Oxford will cough up the cash. That's it really. Maybe we will want 750k and another club will stump up the money without a second thought. I think if we sell him, we need to replace him. And it's easier to keep him. That's it really, my thoughts. We will make money off Styles, Morris, Helik, Collins, no doubt; I think we should look to keep Kane. But to be honest nothing surprises me with these owners. Maybe, as @Redhelen suggests, we'll do something really dumb and loan him out for another year. Stranger things have happened down Grove Street, that's for sure.
I keep saying to people that the club will run out of money this season and will apply for Administration. Unless a combination of Player sales,losses covered by the Hong Kong owners and increased income from ticket sales and sponsorship, plus lower operating costs.