VAR is ruining the game

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by BarnsleyBomber, Aug 17, 2025 at 2:21 PM.

  1. BarnsleyBomber

    BarnsleyBomber Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    4,830
    Likes Received:
    2,298
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Greenland
    Style:
    XenForo - Xenith Reds
    Should be for offside and red cards. Theu are now re reffin the game. Looking at ways to disallow every goal.
     
    GeorgeRobledo likes this.
  2. YT

    YT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2020
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    22,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    In your head
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Referring to Eze’s free kick?

    Utterly mental. An incredible strike and ruled out by VAR and the ref because Guehi was “within a metre of the Chelsea wall”. I’ve no idea what the rules are anymore.
     
    GeorgeRobledo likes this.
  3. red

    redrum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    26,599
    Likes Received:
    19,713
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    If your on about the palace free kick it looked like a well worked foul to me guahi pushes the lad out of the way and eze strikes it where he was stood.
     
  4. Red Mist

    Red Mist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    2,965
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I don't agree.He shoved him out of the way to allow enough space for the ball to be hammered straight into the net.It looked like it was a planned move.Not taking anything away from the strike though cos that was hit true and hard.
     
  5. YT

    YT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2020
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    22,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    In your head
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    That isn’t why it was ruled out. You are allowed to use your shoulder to push against an opponent. For now at least. I’m sure they’ll ban that soon too.

    It was because he was within a metre of a “formed wall of at least three players”. Again, completely new one on me.
     
    RichK likes this.
  6. BarnsleyBomber

    BarnsleyBomber Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2013
    Messages:
    4,830
    Likes Received:
    2,298
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Greenland
    Style:
    XenForo - Xenith Reds

    Utter ****** again. Wen has that rule every been used before.
     
  7. Red Mist

    Red Mist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    2,965
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yes, shoulder-to-shoulder challenges are still allowed in football, but they must be fair and legitimate according to football rules. This means the contact must be shoulder to shoulder, within playing distance of the ball, and without excessive force or dangerous play. The challenge should be an attempt to get the ball, not just to impede the opponent. He wasn't within playing distance of the ball.
     
    GeorgeRobledo likes this.
  8. YT

    YT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2020
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    22,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    In your head
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    For the third time - that isn’t why the goal was ruled out. That wasn’t an offence. He was merely stronger than Caicedo (who didn’t complain). I’m sure it’ll be an offence one day, but not today.
     
    BFC Dave and RichK like this.
  9. Red Mist

    Red Mist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Messages:
    2,965
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Sorry yes you are right,I misread the rule of three or more players in the defensive wall equals opposing players to be a minimum of a metre away.
     
  10. YT

    YT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2020
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    22,376
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    In your head
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Easily done. :D
     
  11. icer

    icer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    6,404
    Likes Received:
    4,215
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Its getting to the stage where watching live play is obsolete. Even today we struggle to know what offences are given for, whats onside, offside etc. its becoming essential to have commentary and now referee announcements. Got me thinking how good football would be if it worked similar to the 60’s and 70’s rules. A few tweaks and it would be a great watch.
     
  12. Men

    Menai Tyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    11,179
    Likes Received:
    7,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Earth
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Rules are a mockery - you can drag the shirt off a players back these days in the area and it’s not even a foul.
     
    Gimson&theBarnsleys likes this.
  13. Gor

    Gordon Ottershaw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    4,482
    Likes Received:
    3,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Old Town
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    New rules that have come in since I started watching football that have actually benefitted the game:

    1 - 3 points for a win, rather than 2
    2 - the back pass rule
    3 - er…I guess making the keeper release the ball from his hands within 8 seconds could be good, but every ref will deal with this slightly differently. And 40 yard screamers that were disallowed cos someone nowhere near the flight of the ball was offside was stupid, so that has stopped, but you can’t really credit the changes to the offside rule because they change it so often I’m never sure what the rules are anymore. There must be a 3rd good new rule though…but I can’t think of one.
     
  14. Dja

    Django Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2013
    Messages:
    12,518
    Likes Received:
    9,784
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I watched that go in, turned the TV off & went out for dinner. I got there & was talking football with my father in law & mentioned Eze had scored a beauty & he says he can’t have it’s 0-0. Cheers VAR, made me look stupid
     
  15. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,663
    Likes Received:
    16,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Offside was brought in to stop "Goal hangers" ie players staying at or on the goal line. The old offside rule only applied in the attacking half of the pitch and resulted in the "Arsenal offside trap" on the halfway line. The rule was changed to stop this. I think we should go back to the old offside rule but only apply it in the attacking third of the pitch. This would stop the "Arsenal offside trap" because it would be just outside the penalty area and thus a much more dangerous tactic. Side benefits would include;

    1) spreading the play in the centre of the pitch,
    2) give the linesman a smaller area to watch, thus allowing him to be in-line more often - the main reason they get it wrong
    3) stop the absurd situation we get now where a player clearly offside is allowed to run after the ball forcing a goalkeeper to sprint off his line and risk injury, only for the flag to then go up

    I think this should be trialed in lower leagues to see if it would work.
     
    WG Red likes this.
  16. Geo

    GeorgeRobledo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    2,652
    Likes Received:
    838
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Top of Birdwell Obelisk.
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    You can’t say “linesman! these days!
     
  17. WG Red

    WG Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2021
    Messages:
    2,692
    Likes Received:
    3,665
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ward Green
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Like that mate
     
  18. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    17,663
    Likes Received:
    16,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I don't know why they didn't just do this instead of the ridiculous rule they have now. I wonder if they did do a trial of something like this?
     

Share This Page