I dont like saying it but if I see Potts on the wing and/or Ugbo as a loan striker I'll be fearing the worst. It would probably be the first time Id have to really question Hecky. Yiadom should be dropped too based on recent performances but then you've got the argument we're taking out more experience. We're really lacking options at the minute and with an out of form Hammill and Barnes I really cant see where goals are coming from. The only guaranteed starters based on average performance over the season are Williams, Lindsay and Barnes. Bradshaw if were were playing 2 up. Thats a massive problem. Come on Reds just put this bad form to bed today. A draw will do. A win would be huge.
I agree. I don't think Potts has been our worst performer in this crappy run but it's pointless having a lump like him on the wing. And we may as well play a traffic cone up front instead of Ugbo, not that our midfield would create much for one.
To be fair Isgrove has hardly been fit all season & I know hammil is up & down but he does bring some lacking experience to the team, always puts a shift i & on his day he is a match winner
442 by the looks of it. Thiam and Bradshaw up front, Gardner and Williams middle, Barnes and Moncur out wide, same back 4 as vs Derby.
I am probably wrong but I don't think it will be 442 like that. I'm suspecting 4 across the back then Williams moncur and Gardner two inches further forward with a handkerchief atop them and then Barnes and thiam on each wing (with thiam a little further forward) and Bradshaw in the middle slightly confused why his striker partner is stood next to the corner flag and he needs binoculars to see moncur and pals.
Fair does. I actually misread your post originally and thought it said they start ahead of hammill 'if at all' rather than 'if all fit'. I wrongly took it as meaning he would be on the bench if he's lucky.
