The main point for me. Is that it shows us as spending near enough 100% of revenue on players. For me, that’s slightly too much - what about other ongoing costs involved? You’d expect the ideal figure to be circa. 80% although more detailed figures might show this. However, it also goes to show the club are spending what they can on players and certainly aren’t holding back within reason. So for me, we can’t complain that the board aren’t backing the team.
