So as well as the footballing direction of travel the biggest prone of questions for me, the status of the legal battle? Given it’s still the same ownership group no idea of still 80/20 but that has been massively damaging, is it still valid or has it gone away as part of the re-shuffle? No running before we can walk and obviously there is the council involvement but we need to start planning for some redevelopment, I get cash will be tight but plans for a new West Stand and some cosmetic touches to stop the place looking still ramshackle, even just new turnstile doors on east stand given they are rotting and a bloody bucket and sponge on the advertisement hoardings! If I was paying for pitch side sponsorship I’d be having a word( obviously not the electronic ones).
Just from picking up titbits on here I think the ownership now looks something like this: Chien Lee 30% Neerav Parekh 25% Cryne family 20% Investors 20% PMG (Conway) 5% The Investors, represented by Julie Quay, having aligned with the Crynes and Parekh means that the balance of power is now approx 65/35 AGAINST Conway and Chien. As I say just my take on it.
