Unpopular opinion but Norwood ran his blood to water and that was what made him ‘better’. Two of those strikers are technically better than Norwood but because they don’t run as hard, they’re not better in most opinions. Norwood was brilliant for us and loved him at Oakwell but he was always replaceable. It’s Andersen and Kitching irreplaceable for us. De Gevigney, McCart, Shepherd and Lopata can’t lace their boots.
Cosgrove - 26 Watters - 24 Dallas - 24 Shaw - 25 Meanwhile Norwood is 33, there is no resale value in 33 year olds and that is unfortunately what our owners and recruitment staff look at, Norwood has a good season with us we still wouldn't be able to sell him on. If any of the above have a couple of good seasons we'd be able to sell them and repeat this cycle. Business wise it makes sense, but football isn't played on paper or behind a desk and I feel like we've made a mistake with the scatter gun approach to lower league signings.
Watters has a goal or assist every two league games. Norwood every two and half games. Norwood played a lot more football. Just an opinion….
Similar conversation was being had on here about people slating Cole, saying he was lazy and uninterested at times last season for the same reason he wasn’t a Norwood type player.
To be fair the way those are playing they have no resale value either, even though they are younger than Norwood.
Norwood got 15 in the league mate. 11 goals, four assists. Watters is one assist behind and it’s beginning of November.
Norwood was good for us, he has that experience and you know what you're going to get from him. Its awful as well that he was allowed to go just 2 days before the opening day. But, did he himself want to go, I'm not sure whether it was the clubs decision or not. And no, we certainly haven't replaced him.
The money that Barnsley wasted on Cosgrove, Watters, Dallas and Shaw could have been used to sign Alfie May. If he had scored the 12 goals for us instead of Charlton then we would be comfortably top of the league now and nailed on for promotion.
Been a poor start for both Watters and Cosgrove but give either a solid run of games and some decent service and I'm sure they'll come good.