I was confused by that comment. He seems to suggest that our high press is 'anti-football'. I presume the opposite would be to let them out of their half and have a lovely old time in attack.
Defending like lions, carrying a threat up front with muscle, mixture of football and fight in midfield. That’s about it. Oh, and a team with a few stroppy, petulant sore losers crying to the ref is how it should be played. Obviously.
Agree with a lot that you've just said, I'm just conscious that we should be careful when massively applauding a system that only really works by borrowing a substantial chunk of cash to kick it all off and demands that you live beyond your means.
It’s what spews forth from pseudo soccer savants when their nouveau riche charges get stuffed at home by teams like Barnsley.