I didn't ask you what your personality was, I ask you why did you post this knowing the outcome, have another go.
My comment on this would not be political. I just find little to admire in a serial shagger getting his latest piece banged up. Laughing in the face of his ill wife and other children. The guy has no morals, no sense of loyalty or truth and as such only deserves contempt.
So you just had to post a thread you damn well knew was going to have this reaction, your either a bit slow or a **** stirrer. Ok, I'll go for a bit slow.
Thought it wasn't due till early summer according to the original reports. It will be the first thing he's managed before a deadline Is that a cheap enough dig ?
You appear to be labouring under the misapprehension that you own a thread on a message board and you can control what other people write. You can control what you write. Nothing else. And you have ownership of nothing. You have every right to post what you did. What happens after that is beyond your control. The only way to prevent people from replying to a subject you have introduced in whatever manner they see fit is to not introduce the subject in the first place.
It's another reason to keep the approval ratings of our greatest Prime Minister high. Not only is he not responsible for 20,000 deaths. But he also recovered from coronavirus with the help of only a million nurses and a ventilator, and now he has had a child (which nobody has ever done before.) Congratulations to the Churchill de nos jours.
Fully understood. I own nothing on here, with the exception of my opinion. It’s my opinion that this country is like every other in the grip of a very real and dangerous virus. My opinion is that the birth of a child is of great joy. My opinion is that personal digs at the father, or the fathers job is out of order. Your final paragraph offers a solution to prevent these replies is not to post in the first place ? There is another solution..... don’t try to switch a nice congratulations post about a child being born, into a political or personal attack. Or is that beyond some people ? in which case it would say more about them than the original post or it’s motives ? So thanks for the effort in replying, it’s appreciated even though not really much substance, but thanks
The things we write are an insight into who we are. But that is a problem for the person who writes it, not the person who begins the thread. The only thing that reflects on you is what you write. Nothing anyone else says undermines your opinion nor taints it. It remains, in black and white, unsullied. Attempting to prevent replies or determine their content will only ever lead to frustration.