So we have a former professional footballer who thinks Kane ISN'T crap versus a former Morrisons shelf stacker who thinks Kane IS crap... Genuinely torn as to whose opinion I value the most here!!!!
Harry Kane's stats at club and international level, the quality of the club he plays for, the esteem in which he's held by rival players etc all make it pretty conclusive that he's a good striker. There's a reasonable debate to be had on how good. To state he's crap is just sensationalist, provocative bulls**t. No one with any ability for critical thought could seriously make that statement.
A premier league striker's ability is measured on his goal return and what else he brings to the team if he's supporting a fellow striker etc. As Kane is consistently banging in goals for club and country at the highest level, I cant see how anyone can brand him as crap. You don't get extra points for solo efforts from your own area or overhead kicks... a goal's a goal.