Because you have absolutely zero evidence to support this statement from yourself "If they get blown to pieces then yippee as far as they're concerned - they're off where they want to go - their heaven" other than the fact they are Muslim. You certainly don't have their actions as evidence because they are very much alive so all you are left with is their religion.
Politics is in a sorry state tbh. But I'd have respect for him if he had a back bone and stuck to decisions. I'm no minion and he's the pm so I can't criticise.
The world has plenty of evidence with regard to what religious fanatics do - their martyrdom - from Manhattan to Manchester. Along with plenty of evidence as to who sponsors their activities. Allowing a religious fundamentalist government possession of a nuclear bomb would in my opinion be the start of the end of the world.
I'm not sure that sticking rigidly to positions is always a good thing when the facts appear to change (as they frequently do in the political sphere). But I think you can certainly criticize. And I'm sure you must have a view of who you would prefer to see instead as PM?
Irrelevant Mr Kaht. Either you accept that Starmer is a complete, shape-shifting, unprincipled arsehole or you dont. Asking everybody to say who they'd prefer is a red herring of blue whale proportions. (yes a herring is a fish and a whale isn't). Starmer is a disgrace. His lawyerly skills fail to recognise Netanyahu as a war criminal and Israel as in contravention of nuclear non proliferation treaties. He fails to condemn atrocities in Gaza and continues to supply weapons. He's a complete twa.t. So, as a comment I'd again say your continual request to people who disagree with Starmer is a red herring, a limp fish, a damp squid and a mussel with no strength. He's a twa.t.
Such as the religious fundamentalist Jews who refuses to tell the world how many nuclear weapons they have you mean?
Fair enough! I don't see a leadership challenge anytime soon though, do you? Regarding Mr Redrum, I don't know if he is aligned with the Conservatives or whether he swings Reform's way. I'm assuming (rightly or wrongly) he'd be more on the right
Are you trying to get me to say farage or torys so you can call me racist, simpleton and the rest and get loads of likes? Sorry to disappoint but I don't think that would be good either. But I think the reason they are popular at the minute is because the clown in charge u turns on everything and is the most unpopular prime minister in my lifetime. Like I said politics is in a sorry state.
If Redrum says things I think are correct I'll agree with him even if he's extreme right or left. Doesn't matter to me on specific issues. As to challenges to Starmer we'll have to see long term. As I've said before though I'm not voting Labour again - and I'm Labour. I've decided already. The party is a disgrace. And there are loads of people like me. Reform will lap them up, lib dems will have em and the greens and Tories will have some. Starmer and McSweeney have ruined Labour. Disability cuts next and that will play well with the vulnerable no doubt. As I said Starmer is a twa.t (and did I say he was a liar?)
I really don't want to call you either of those things. I am genuinely interested. I try to debate the issues and avoid hurling abuse (might not always succeed!) And I've honestly never cared less about 'likes'!
Quiet! You'll wake Jimmy Viz! I think you'll be rid of Sir Keir in 2029 because even if neither the Conservatives or Reform win outright they will link up afterwards to form a combined majority. It will not be a good day, but it's coming.
Jees, it's like Iraq all over again. There's no proof of this whatsoever. It's just a dumb, lazy, zero proof nonsense on your part. What there is a greater risk of right now is Israel launching a nuke on Iran.
You do not abuse. You never do. But you do patronise and ridicule by subtle (unsubtle) insinuating comment sometimes. I'm not having a go at you either. I'm just saying that sometimes you do...You've not done it on this thread at all and I'm not petty enough to search but if you want me to flag you next time I will . I'm not trying to be funny or disrespectful either!!
Fair enough. Apologies for that. I don't know who would be a good choice. Do you think starmers reign has been good?
Israel already has nukes. You don't think they arent run by religious fundamentalists right now? You don't think Netenyahu has political and personal reasons to extend this war? You're delusional mate. Try looking at the here and now rather than the fantasy in your head.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/starmer-benefit-cuts-labour-whip-quits-b2773463.html Resigned over the pip cuts
Can't read it mate - my phone is steam powered and if there's no coal (thanks Margaret) it won't read links
