He was his own worst enemy. I didn't have an issue with him in general but as soon as he started offering information in return for likes he just gave the impression of being an attention seeker and a bit sad.
I never really understood the security Stasis where I work - every year these audit idiots would ask why we had accounts still on system for people who had left. And every year I would explain if you totally Removed them you wiped the audit trial of what they did, so it was far better to lock their accounts.
I think that's what every company does. We call them deleted accounts but they're actually just locked. Everything they've done is still in the logs, but the account can't be accessed. No communication is sent to their email address. No personal details about the user are stored. And the user is protected in perpetuity as no one can use their username or email address again to create a new account. It's by far the best form of security for the user and prevents anyone ever accessing the system in future using their details. If the user requires access again, the head of the organisation for whom they work contacts us, the account is resurrected and they carry on with the same username and email address as before. If a user changes email address, the old account account is locked and a new one created.
Yes, he's asked to be removed on two separate occasions now. His behaviour on the last occasion as well as some additional stuff I'm not going to go into means he isn't welcome back and his account will remain blocked. Any new signups will also be blocked. I'm not getting into a discussion about this.