I'd totally forgotten about it. I'd be surprised if anything is announced this year based on Reading/Wigan/Derby etc
Perhaps the dilution of shares means it’s on the back burner. Hardly worth prioritising a club where the rule breakers are no longer people of significant control. Could be focusing on Reading and other miscreants.
While I don't think for a minute the punishment will be remotely in the same ballpark, weren't Luton deducted 30 points for the misdemeanours of their previous owners?
I was referring to the timescale rather than the eventual punishment. I assume the EFL only have so many people competent to be involved in investigating owners, and investing current issues is probably more of a priority than investigating historic ones that can be done on a time scale to suit the EFL.
20 points for the way they came out of administration- not got clue what that means. 10 points for trying to hide payments to agents Guessing the first one must be a financial issue given the penalty. Anything much worse than Birmingham slap on wrist last season I would imagine would result in an appeal which would almost certainly be successful as a precedent was set. Edit: just googled it and the 20 points were for failing to complete an insolvency agreement and reflective of Luton putting themselves into the insolvency process 3 times in 10 years.