Makes the decision to keep him in the job when he clearly did not want it even more baffling Also it doesn’t read well for the owners does it?
So he told the club in March he was ******* off regardless, and they still kept him until it was free to get shot. He didn’t look interested at any point - and to be fair he quite probably wasn’t it appears. They still kept him when there were still games to be won that might have kept us up. Can’t say I’m surprised.
What does it say about the owners when this guy wants off regardless? I believe what he says. Explains why no one worth their salt hangs around.
Wouldn’t surprise me if the conversation in March was during the international break, which we’ve managed a haul of 2 points out of 15 since
Why blame the owners. Might have been the fans. More likely to be the fans. The dinosaur age fans **** me off every week. It's called football, not hoof ball.
Talking out of your backside if you think that. Majority of fans gave him plenty of time and encouragement, considering how low we felt at the time. We couldn't really berate him because we never even heard of him. Yeah, it turned sour - but he isn't innocent in why it turned. Ridiculous subs, poor formations, sitting back on a lead for 70 minutes...
Extremely embarrassing for the owners given they supposedly tracked Poya previously. Who'd want to work for these muppets?