Of course, the less people vaccinated, the more the NHS can be opened up with less need for ICU beds for people with Covid, and less fear of Covid getting into hospitals and finishing off the already vulnerable. I'm in general disagreement with your entire post, but this bit is just completely illogical nonsense.
You’d have to show me where I called anyone selfish. Of course we all want to get back to normal - but we have to be realistic, you can’t wipe out a pandemic by wishing it away.
Let's fact check that. Yours was post 7 in the thread. Post 1: a link and no other words Post 2: someone criticising Tony Blair with no comment about covid. Post 3: someone calling post 2 a troll. No comment on covid. Post 4: criticising Tony Blair but backing the vaccine Poor 5: says that we have to remember that under 40s of fit health are extremely low risk whilst also pointing out we need to vaccinate the vulnerable. Post 6: says that Tony's comments are propaganda Post 7: you inexplicably stating that this thread is full of people dismissing 150k dead as irrelevant. Your post is nothing but a complete and utter lie. Not one person in this thread had even mentioned anything at all even vaguely related to the absolute ******** claim that you made. Either you are a complete liar, are thick as pig **** or you suffering from some extreme mental psychosis where you are completely imagining things that aren't happening.
The last two lines are unwarranted, ST. Jimmy Viz may be an agent provocateur at times, but I don't think he is any of the things mentioned in your last line. We can do better than this, can't we?
Tell me what was incorrect. His was completely false and as usual made completely baseless accusations against other posters and yet he is defended we just a bit of an agent provocateur, don't worry about it. Anyone who doesn't toe the party line get told theyre out of order and are better than this. Is he not better than accusing people of not caring about 150000 deaths when not a single person had even commented anything like that? why why am I better than calling him out as a liar but you don't mind or care that he calls people conspiracy theorists, are told by him to get back to watching David icke, that they're idiotic, that they don't care about death etc? Why does he get a free pass to insult and degrade as much as he wants but when I pick him up on his bare faced lie with actual facts proving his post was a lie then I'm out of order? Sorry but if someone lies I'll call them a liar.
Blair started out good, his ego makes Kanye West or Victor Orban look like lightweights. His legacy is war, millions dead & sucking up to George W. Thats before we get on to privatising schools & health. Then he was middle east peace envoy. I don't know whether to piss or **** myself thinking about that reality. I have realised that no decent person is ever going to rule our country. It is a succession of horrible people. Only ones I'd save from drowning in my lifetime are Harold Wilson, Jim Callaghan (more out of pity TBH), John Major, just so he could slag off his own party for the rest of his life over Brexit, and Gordon Brown. Would have loved Jeremy to win it, but it never happened.
The language was probably over the top for sure. But he's 100% right that nobody in the thread even came close to suggesting that. I actually typed a reply to him at the time saying "who has said that? But decided agaisnt it as I didn't think I would get rational repsonse.
You would probably take a different view if it was your loved one who went to war back then and ended up with life changing injurys or even worse. He really shouldnt get the airtime he does.