Unsocial Distancing

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Superhiggy, Dec 20, 2020.

  1. Sup

    Superhiggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2016
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    897
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The way the games going football will be like covid.If you get within 2 metres of an opposing player you will get sent off. And referees are twice more inconsistent now as they ever were. Yet another weekend of laughable decisions.
     
    arabian_ian likes this.
  2. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    16,626
    Likes Received:
    14,631
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Players falling over when somebody brushes against them is definitely a joke now
     
    arabian_ian likes this.
  3. Mid

    Mido Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,022
    Likes Received:
    7,365
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    They will keep doing it whilst they keep getting the decision. Some of the decisions in the Newcastle game were pathetic, and not just the Wilson penalty.
     
    arabian_ian and North Yorks Red like this.
  4. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,151
    Likes Received:
    11,597
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    I mean how did the ref watch replays of that Newcastle penatly incident and still give it and send the player off? Note nothing to with VAR and all to with idiots we have using it.
     
    arabian_ian likes this.
  5. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    16,626
    Likes Received:
    14,631
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It would held with VAR if they roped it back in a bit with offside and stopped giving them if a players eyelash is in front
     
  6. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,151
    Likes Received:
    11,597
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Maybe but then how far would you take it? What would be the margin of acceptable error?
    I agree its tedious to watch them drawing lines but if you are going to use it then you have to go the letter if the law of the game.
     
  7. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    16,626
    Likes Received:
    14,631
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I’d go back to where their feet are and leave it at that
     
    Redhelen likes this.
  8. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,151
    Likes Received:
    11,597
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Not saying I disagree but major rule change needed for that, certainly think it all needs to be looked at.
     
  9. Sup

    Superhiggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2016
    Messages:
    785
    Likes Received:
    897
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I've got a good idea scrap it and go back to normal.
     
  10. Mis

    MiserablePontyEnder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2012
    Messages:
    4,008
    Likes Received:
    1,773
    Location:
    Sat on my arse watching box sets
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Wiseman, Kennedy and McNulty must've thought this was an actual rule when they played for us.
     
  11. Mid

    Mido Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,022
    Likes Received:
    7,365
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Exactly, people moan about technology being used but that’s not the issue, it’s the idiots using it who are. I honestly thought he was about to overturn it, then he brings the red card out. It never crossed my mind that it was a red card offence.
     
    Redstone likes this.
  12. Did

    Didcot Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,470
    Likes Received:
    3,319
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Retired
    Location:
    Didcot
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The genie is out of the bottle now. The problem is that an "eye lash" offside is still offside. We need something like "umpires call" in cricket. Perhaps assistant referees call. If the offside is within a ball width of being onside or vica versa it is within the margin of error.

    In the old days "level" was offside and a player in an office position could be flagged offside even if the player was "not interfereing with play". The modern equivalent term is "not active". The old rule led Cloughie to state that " is the player is not interfering with play what is he doing on the pitch!.
     
    Redhelen likes this.
  13. pompey_red

    pompey_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,565
    Likes Received:
    9,629
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fareham
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    cricket have it largely right.

    LBW - can be both out or not our based on the umpires decision but can also be definitely not out or definitely out too :)

    Run outs are largely similar to goal line tech, a definitive answer one way or the other... at the minute this is what offsides give an answer to too, I’d change it based on the linesman’s decision, umpires call replaced by some form of tolerance level so a toe nail difference might not offside etc
     

Share This Page