******

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by John Peachy, Sep 19, 2020.

  1. Exi

    Exile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,818
    Likes Received:
    6,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley
    There's absolutely nothing whatsoever that Chaplin or Frieser did yesterday that Woodrow couldn't have done and more than likely he would have put one of their chances at 0-0 away too.
     
  2. Red

    Red Rain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    4,811
    Likes Received:
    2,864
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wombwell
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I did not see the game yesterday, so I cannot argue the point. My post was based upon what I saw last season.

    Last season, Woodrow could not press as Struber wanted when we did not have the ball. That is why he preferred Brown in the front two. He could not work hard enough and was not positive enough with his passing, and that is why he was not a success in the No10 role. The point that everyone is making, that Woodrow was at his best in a front two with a big man is correct, but Struber does not play that way because that type of front two does not press in the way he wants. Because they do not press in the way he wants, we win less ball back early, and therefore we create fewer chances when the opposition are least prepared, that is, when they have lost the ball in a bad position. That is the point I am making about the system not being as much about individuals.
     

Share This Page