But they didn't did they? We could have been 2 up before they had a shot on target so your original point makes no sense.
Im guessing you watched it - and wont know what’s happened until your carer explains it to you. Ask them.
Well, owd lad all I can say it's a good job we won or you would have had a coronary and be in the General.
Most will. But thick fookers on here just think it’s an opportunity to have a dig. Long overdue that Admin sweep all those off this message board - only allowing those to post that have the intelligence to actually contribute to discussions.
This thread should really be a discussion about Strubers team selection. And it’s been Hijacked again by those that haven’t the ability to contribute - they just slime out of the woodwork. A countless number of people have stopped posting on here because of these horrible slime balls - and Admin continue to let them post.
So we won then? Excellent news. Gives us a real chance of staying up and continues a fantastic run of form. Made my night.
There are two schools of thought here. The first is you start with you best team with the most technical players and try to win the game early. A bit like a heavyweight boxer who’s a one punch knockout artist who can’t go the distance. The second school of thought is you start with a more industrious and workmanlike team who run their nuts off, get about the opposition, tire them out THEN bring on the talented players who can beat a man with pace or a trick and can pick a pass. Attack on the break with pace. Good old rope-a-dope. I don’t for one minute think that Struber has been lucky in that his subs just sort of worked. They’ll have been planned (in the main - notwithstanding injury to Palmer) to help create momentum at specific points when the opposition get tired. I don’t think any team in the division would fancy Thomas, Chaplain and Brown running at them with Mowatt and Woodrow providing the ammunition when they are knackered.