I'm wishing for owners that want us to get as far as we can as a football club, that " get" our club and who are prepared to invest accordingly, within FFP.
yeah, youre right. On face value a lot of similarities: Lots of noise over wealth of foreign investor but unsubstantiated (fronted by a Football agent) Majority Shareholder based in Abu Dhabi (as opposed to Hong Kong) Opening statement about building relationships with fans and Very little investment in January transfers. Even more interesting is that the Majority shareholder has still not passed the EFL test for a proper owner so how the hell has this deal gone through?
Football fans are fickle look at Coventry one minute they are protesting they want the owners out, dont hear that now they are top of league one pulling in decent gates (considering they are playing in another city). Cant defend our owners though imo they have to take responsibility for the poor decisions and our league position.
And we think we have problems https://cafc.co.uk/news/view/5e66d30dc5f81/statement-from-executive-chairman-matt-southall
The latest club the not fit for purpose EFL have allowed to be bought by a chancer. How many more clubs are the EFL going to risk going under before something is done about them?
Makes our current owners look relatively good doesnt it at least on the information we have available at the moment, for all their flaws
Hes resigned https://cafc.co.uk/news/view/5e67651e1e92d/statement-from-matt-southall-executive-chairman
Interesting....so does that mean that a third of the money being put up (if there ever was any) has now gone? If so that must make their prediciment even more perilous? This is where the EFL need to ask some searching compliance questions regarding how sustainable is their business model and to prove it...........
Yet again the utter incompetence of the EFL comes to the fore. Just when you think lessons may have been learned they go and do this! How was the deal allowed to happen if this chap has failed to pass the Owners and Directors' Test? Also he's not provided proof of funds.
According to the first statement he was the major shareholder so youd expect him to have at least 34% stake. Can only assume that the other two must have bought him out. I cant imagine hed walk away with nothing.
Looks like the takeover hadn't even gone through and they may have to resubmit. All looks a bit shambolic. https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-after-public-disagreement-between-new-owners