Offer opinion which differs from yours, get insulted, repeat repeat repeat. Youre nothing if not consistent nip. Have a nice evening.
Out of curiosity, what is your lifetime experience that brings you to these simplified conclusions about a complicated world. I'm eager to hear.
You haven’t offered an opinion, you made a trite statement. You refused to acknowledge ‘evidence’ to the point of ignoring it even when it’s pointed out. Everyone is entitled to an ‘opinion’ but that doesn’t mean all opinions are valid. So back to the topic at hand; as someone else has asked, are you happier with making benefit much more difficult to get and killing more people, creating more poverty, or making it easier to claim? just a little background though; honest people have more difficulty navigating the complex benefit system and will often not bother, OTOH crooks will quickly learn the correct script to take advantage of any system.
Do you agree that the 2 stories in the Express that I posted are reporting the same thing in 2 completely different ways? Do you agree that the headlines makes one leader look good and the other bad, if not, irresponsible and untrustworthy? Do you agree that the reader will then be biased when reading any other similarly reported stories? Do you agree this is focused propaganda and if you control enough of the information outlets and you can get enough people to think the way you want them to then you will control who gets in power? Or do you just take no notice and carry on thinking as you did before despite (your own admission) not knowing the facts.
Unfortunately companies with share holders will always pass on the cost to consumers, especially when demand is fairly in-elastic. There’s already a massive funding gap in public social care. The government already tried to wheedle their way out of tough decisions by claiming its a cross party issue in their manifesto. At the end of the day people are going to find they have less money for the essentials in life, but I’m sure we’ll still be able to get cheap 70 inch TVs and cheap flights to Benidorm and your local takeaway is probably already using indentured labour/illegals. So your average leave voter will be happy at first with all this tough talk from Pratti Patel. What’s going to be even more interesting is when the French move the border back to Dover and turn a blind eye to illegals coming in. The people traffickers and forgers must be rubbing their hands. Imagine, we allegedly have 1 million illegals here now, what’s going to happen when they cut off the route for those who come in legally? Big increase in sham marriages, a huge black market for papers.... and just wait until we find out the head gammons like that Wetherspoons owner are employing illegals, oh yes it’s going to be a real sht show.
It’s the case that nurses are paid more then entry level doctors, but it’s the potential to progress that’s the difference. Same with care workers vs nurses - there is clear spine scale progression for nurses as they get more experienced not available for care workers.
You didn't know the facts, admitted you didn't, criticised Corbyn anyway, then agreed that the press can swing the so called facts to fit their agenda and then repeated some of the propaganda you've just agreed that the press come out with against Corbyn (as you were doing all through the election). They've got you round their little finger. By the way, the missus and me are 2 of the 8.5 million (so called) economically inactive despite being of working age....should we have to do this unskilled (no such thing in any job) work when there are positions that need filling due to immigrants being barred from them?
You've got no chance of a reply to that last post Shenk. Instead he'll pop up in a different thread with some weird rhetoric in place of fact, then when challenged he'll take offence, dissapear and the cycle starts again. Edit: there we are. Monk Bretton is unsafe and women and shopkeepers are in grave danger.
What propaganda did I repeat, dint like Corbyn or his beliefs and made that obvious during the election, as far as he’s concerned even his iwn party turned on him of course I know that newspapers add whichever slant to a story they lean toward, I’ve read the Guardian ! And as far as work is concerned I don’t know your personal circumstances so I can’t possibly comment on your situation can I ? Chill out man.
Carry on stalking my posts with your sarky comments Fonzie, I din’t suppose you work in social services, in Rotherham, in Rochdale, in Huddersfield by any chance ? It’s all nonsense, its racism, ignore them they’re racists. You carry in happy clapping nip, if you clap loud enough you’ll drown out the reality, they’ll be a grown up along shortly to deal with the reality.
It's hard not to 'stalk' your posts when they're all over the forum spouting the same racist wibble. Keep the replies coming, Nip, you make this place a funnier place, Nip. Nip. Edit: The cases you mention are clearly abhorrent and disgusting. As was the Jersey Grooming Scandal - perpetrated by White British People. Each is as bad as the other. No matter the colour or creed, sexual abuse is vile. Don't put one above the other just because 'them brown people' did it.
As was the scandal with Cyril Smith, who I believe was MP for Rochdale, abusing boys in care... And Jimmy Saville, the Catholic Church, Rolf Harris, etc, etc. In fact, we see a lot less calls to ban the Catholic church than Islam for some reason.... Most sexual abuse is within the family. Most murders are by partners or ex-partners. But that does not mean we don't have deranged nutters within all walks of life.
I don’t, but the practice of dismissing anyone voicing concerns as racist and trouble causing for ‘brown people’ because they don’t like them is the very attitude I’m talking about. It’s the very reason people vote in Barnsley for the far right such as BNP because they’re written off as knuckle draggers rather than being listened to. But you carry in with your dismissiveness nip, they’ll be a grown up along at some point I’m sure.