OT: BBS anonymous voting intentions poll

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Gravy Chips, Jan 28, 2019.

?

Who would you vote for?

Poll closed Feb 4, 2019.
  1. Labour

    70 vote(s)
    50.4%
  2. Conservatives

    28 vote(s)
    20.1%
  3. Lib Dem

    9 vote(s)
    6.5%
  4. UKIP

    3 vote(s)
    2.2%
  5. Green

    9 vote(s)
    6.5%
  6. Independent candidate

    4 vote(s)
    2.9%
  7. Other

    2 vote(s)
    1.4%
  8. Spoiled ballot

    3 vote(s)
    2.2%
  9. Wouldn't vote

    11 vote(s)
    7.9%
  1. MDG

    MDG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wilthorpe
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)

    Another point about Norway. A friend of mine lives in Norway and actually picks up his passport and leaves the country to do his food shopping as the cost their is ridiculous. That doesn't sound like something we want replicated here.
     
  2. Dan

    DannyWilsonLovechild Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    15,723
    Likes Received:
    19,918
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Murdoch "switched sides" because it was obvious there was an absolute landslide about to happen. Murdoch's shift didn't cause the massive landslide.

    I think the likelihood are more political parties and more coalitions. There are 16.1m voters who voted to remain. If that is their main priority, they currently have no home. I suspect Labour and Conservative will lose a significant vote at the next GE.
     
  3. MDG

    MDG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wilthorpe
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Areas of our train system with very close London links may be able to be profitable under any ownership, but outside that it is a massive struggle.
     
  4. Ses

    Sestren Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,856
    Likes Received:
    4,851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Fantastic - that means that when they're all brought under national control we can cross-subsidise neglected lines further away from London by using those tasty profits. Everyone's a winner.
     
    Burgundy Red and Terry Nutkins like this.
  5. Marlon

    Marlon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    HERE.
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    They said that about all links till east coast proved otherwise now they saying it’s because it’s london . Truth is they can all be run effectively both financially and commuter friendly
     
  6. Marlon

    Marlon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    HERE.
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    There was no landslide , Tories only got in by Liberal Democrat’s
     
  7. shenk1

    shenk1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    6,603
    Likes Received:
    4,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Urine Extraction Technician
    Location:
    Elsecar By The Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    If all these nationalised industries were so crap and unprofitable why were the rich so keen to get their hands on them?
     
    Terry Nutkins and Marlon like this.
  8. MDG

    MDG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wilthorpe
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    We'll have to agree to disagree on that one Marlon. This country has become so London centric in terms of infrastructure etc, I just can't see public railways working ever again cost effectively. Don't get me wrong, I would be completely in favour of such but I don't think it can be done without massive demands on the public purse. Can you really see a government run system improving things in the North.. No matter which party is in power? It's all about London..
     
  9. MDG

    MDG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wilthorpe
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Because it's far easier to run a small concentrated strand than a national network. Plus they have just reaped profits via massive price hikes for travel by train. Public would go beserk if we saw the same increases under a nationalised rail system, hence then putting the reliance on government funding from the public purse..
     
  10. Marlon

    Marlon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    HERE.
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Yet they are making money in them only the profits aren’t being reinvested they go straight into shareholders pockets .
    Granted because of neglect by these company’s investment is needed to get them back to scratch but we’d need the Tories not to sell them for s pittance to their mates as soon as they are profutabke again .
     
  11. shenk1

    shenk1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    6,603
    Likes Received:
    4,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Urine Extraction Technician
    Location:
    Elsecar By The Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So basically the taxpayer paid more taxes to provide these services at an affordable price for all, but the rich paid more tax than the poor so paid more in. Now the public has to pay more for the same (or worse) service and the rich take the profits from it but pay less tax than they did before.
     
  12. shenk1

    shenk1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    6,603
    Likes Received:
    4,181
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Urine Extraction Technician
    Location:
    Elsecar By The Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Wait 'till after we leave the EU....
     
  13. She

    Sheriff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    3,411
    Likes Received:
    6,422
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Never voting Tory, but now also refusing to support a Labour party dominated by far left entryists who are actively trying to de-select the most effective MPs they have.

    Lib Dem would ordinarily be the best available option, but am also disillusioned with their inability to make any progress under Vince Cable (hardly a dynamic leader). Right now, my most likely option would be to spoil a ballot paper in order to be counted in turnout. Green would be an option for a protest vote, but they're unlikely to field a candidate in my constituency.
     
  14. MDG

    MDG Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Messages:
    5,844
    Likes Received:
    4,353
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Wilthorpe
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Quite astonishing on the last election, I contacted all candidates except the BNP to ask what they thought were the key pressure points were for the ward. Green party candidate openly admitted that they didn't know and quoted their national agenda. Vote winner = nope.
     

Share This Page