It can't be anything to do with that because the other week a photo of him looking thoroughly pissed off that we had scored a goal was shared and Gally himself made fun of him in the thread.
Well, I wouldn't want to comment on if you are mad or not but I removed it. It's not really very nice to post a photo for the sole purpose of ridiculing him when he has no right to reply plus he messaged me and was upset about it although there is a certain degree of irony about this. Admittedly, I made a comment the last time he was included on a much larger crowd photo so I am also a hypocrite
Aren't images of fans behaving like dicks posted on here fairly regularly? Dont want someone to comment on your behaviour at a game then don't behave like a dick who was more interested in gesturing to opposition fans than celebrating a goal. If it was an ordinary photo then fair enough but surely a photo of a Barnsley fan acting like a clown deserves ridicule. If it was anyone but him it would be allowed IMO. Not arguing with your decision or anything I just feel that because it's the perpetual victim (in reality the perpetual antagonist) it is treated differently
Would it feel off if you didn't know who the person in the photo was and people were posting that he is more interested in having a go at opposition fans than celebrating a goal?
Why? It’s not like anyone was ridiculing him. Is it because his face is suddenly known and he’s not just a troll behind a keyboard?
If he still posted on here and could speak up for himself that would be different. Just feels snidey to me.
I'm sure his picture has been posted on here before. I've never met Phil but I knew it was him in the picture posted on here earlier today.
Yeah it has but at the time I didn’t have a clue what he looked like so asked if it was him (after a big hint was given) and that post got deleted. I suppose people on a forum wanting their identity private (or at least not brought up) is fair enough.