Sounds like a kid to me. There's one working with Andy Giddings this weekend as part of the BBC News School Report project. Hecky was exemplary in his humouring of the little chap and his questions. So....probably best picking on an adult instead.
This formation was popular a few years ago and can be an effective way of switching between defence and attack. The 3-5-2 has three defenders, five midfielders and two attackers. The two wide midfielders are really attacking full-backs, so you could almost call it a 5-3-2 formation if you wanted to. Glenn Hoddle favoured this system when he was in charge of England. Across the back line there are three central defenders - occasionally with one acting as a sweeper - so it provides good cover at the back if the two central defenders are vulnerable. Almost Greeny
Wilson MK1 used 3-5-2 regularly. Eaden and Thompson/Barnard as wing backs, Matty Appleby as sweeper. Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
He might do but i'm waiting until saturday night when Hemsy can speak the gospel about how Burton play from his one live game of the season there.
So really it depends who you use there and how they play, like if you use full backs there then its a 5-3-2 and if it's wingers it's 3-5-2
So what you are saying is that my cousin who's not missed a home match this season is wrong? Like I said, they have changed formation at a few matches but mostly played 532