I've done this before but never gone this far back before. This is post-war now, not just back to Wilson's first spell in charge. Here's our most successful team win percentage wise for games they started in the league. GK Bialowski DF Rory Delap DF Kevin Long MF Ronnie Wallwork MF Andy Kiwomya MF Paul Kane MF John O'Sullivan MF Josh Brownhill FW Mark Jackson FW George Maris FW Ashley Fletcher Some only ever started one game (Maris, Jackson, Kiwomya) but the likes of Brownhill, Fletcher and Long hit double figures for starts and still managed win percentages of 71-73% It's just for fun. I'm not trying to say this team would tear up the Championship (It most certainly wouldn't) Subs bench (The next 7 best winning/start percentages in the league) DF Callum Connolly DF Terry Craven FW Ian Moores GK George Rymer FW Nile Ranger DF James Bree DF George Williams
Can you easily refine the selection to only those players who made, say, 20 first team appearances or more, i.e. at least half a season?
In that case we would go with an 18 man squad consisting of: MF Josh Brownhill Won 71% of 24 league games started scoring 3 goals with a clean sheet ratio of 56% DF James Bree Won 65% of 26 league games started with a clean sheet ratio of 35% DF George Williams Won 65% of 20 league games started scoring 1 goal with a clean sheet ratio of 54% DF Aidy White Won 64% of 22 league games started with a clean sheet ratio of 39% MF Lloyd Isgrove Won 60% of 30 league games started scoring 1 goal. MF Marley Watkins Won 56% of 39 league games started scoring 6 goals. DF Neil Thompson Won 56% of 27 league games started scoring 5 goals with a clean sheet ratio of 37% DF Harry May Won 52% of 105 league games started with a clean sheet ratio of 30% FW Colin Walker Won 52% of 21 league games started scoring 12 goals. DF Alfie Mawson Won 52% of 52 league games started scoring 8 goals with a clean sheet ratio of 35% MF Bobby Downes Won 51% of 43 league games started scoring 1 goal with a clean sheet ratio of 40% MF Graham Collier Won 50% of 22 league games started scoring 2 goals with a clean sheet ratio of 45% GK Adam Davies Won 50% of 74 league games started with a clean sheet ratio of 37% MF Peter Whyke Won 50% of 26 league games started scoring 1 goal. MF Neil Warnock Won 49% of 53 league games started scoring 10 goals. FW Allan Clarke Won 49% of 47 league games started scoring 15 goals. FW Derek Bell Won 49% of 45 league games started scoring 20 goals. MF Clint Marcelle Won 49% of 37 league games started scoring 8 goals. Notable stats included.
That's excellent. Some interesting names. Cheers for the 20 game thing, could you work it into something like a playable formation or would that bugger it up?
Choosing a formation from the squad you would have to include Adam Davies as he's the only goalkeeper although he isn't in the top eleven for win % So with that being the case if it was me I'd go with this: GK: Adam Davies RWB: James Bree CD: Alfie Mawson LD: Aidy White RD: George Williams LWB: Neil Thompson RW: Lloyd Isgrove CM: Clint Marcelle CM: Josh Brownhill LW: Marley Watkins CF: Derek Bell I've favoured players I've actually seen play. Then gone with Derek Bell for the goals ratio.
That's pretty interesting. Would it be too complicated to weight the statistics, so that wins in the Premier League are worth more than the 3rd tier? Then we might see an even more interesting picture emerging (like Peter Marksted turns out to be our best ever centre half?!)
You could weight em however you want couldn't you to get whatever result you want near enough. I suppose I could work on a system giving points for clean sheets and wins according to the league they were in. I've got to do something instead of actual work at work!
Statistically That team is carp. Football is a team game so you can't rate individual players on team results. At best it only vaguely implies the contributions of a player. Besides which, in statistical terms a sample size of a handful games is insignificant, it has to be a good half-season to be even considered. Ash Fletcher and Josh Brownhill might just squeeze in.
Re: Statistically Dunno, but from your reply, I'm guessing you were illustrating how useless statistics are and I simply reinforced it.