Because about half our team were looking for a foul off the ref when had they tracked back would have probably stopped the goal.
cant believe people are making excuses and blaming refereeing decisions etc we got a footballing lesson until the sending off, that red card was the only thing stopping us getting a hammering. far too many players moaning and not playing to the whistle Marley should have played, Winnalls going on my dart board tonight
Reading were clearly the better side. Prior to the sending off they looked like they could score at will. The taught us a lesson both on the field and those of us off the field who had been getting carried away. The most obvious penalty I've seen for many a live long day. If I were the ref is have given it against us. Come on be real.
Could disagree more. We have a good aide.and should, have won. Hence, the standing ovationvat the end
On Tiesday night we had less possession than Wolves last Saturday we had less possession than Preston. Derby had 60% possession. I'm not a Sky TV football fan. I don't just see statistics and go with them I analyse their value. 11 v 11 Reading ripped us to shreds.
No. We had a worldy from outside the box that hot the bar and missed a scrambled chance. Reading were all over us. We were awful. As I said you are entitled to your opinion.
Armstrongs fresh air kick s couple of chances missed by winall that he'd normally tuck away But you keeping been downbeat
Today after about 50 and 52 minutes Hourihane set up two brilliant chances which at least one should have gone in.
Not worth bothering with lads, he seems blind of the fact we played 60mins with an extra man. Of course we'll have more shots, possession, corners when they just sit back and absorb after demolishing us to score 2. Anyway... I'm part of the de-Winnall brigade. Armstrong and Watkins please Hecky. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I thought we had enough chances to win the game easily but it was one of those days. Armstrong first half, Winalls header, hourihanes shot with reading player dragging him by the shirt, 3 of our players oblivious to where the ball was in their 6 yarder, 3 good chances for hammill and Kent hitting the bar. There were more but my memory's shocking. A big difference between the two sides today in my opinion were the way we used the right wingers. Mcleary had the beating of white so they constantly bombarded that side of the field. Kent had the beating of their full back yet we only went that way for less than half of the attacks. I think it's great that we can normally attack from so many angles but on this occasion, I believe pressure in the one area would have got the rewards. Anyway never mind, we'll move on and get back on the horse